Bribery Act Guidance

The Government provides guidance for businesses on complying with the Bribery Act 2010, which came into force on 1 July 2011. The Act was originally scheduled to take effect in April 2011, but its implementation was delayed to allow the final version of the guidance to be completed.

Section 7 of the Act makes it an offence for a commercial organisation to fail to prevent bribery. A business can provide a defence by showing that it had in place adequate procedures to prevent bribery from taking place, however, and the guidance details the approach that should be taken when implementing such procedures. The overriding point is that these should be proportionate in view of the likelihood of bribery occurring, which will depend on the size of the business and the countries and markets in which it operates. Although the principles remain similar to those in the draft guidance, published in September 2010, the advice in the final version is more detailed.

Section 14 of the Act provides that where an offence is committed with the consent or connivance of a senior officer of an organisation, that person (as well as the body corporate or partnership) is guilty of the offence and liable to be proceeded against and punished accordingly.

Under Section 11 of the Act, the maximum penalty for individuals is 10 years’ imprisonment or an unlimited fine, or both. The maximum penalty for commercial organisations is an unlimited fine.

The guidance includes case studies to illustrate what approach businesses might take in certain situations and can be found here. There is also a ‘quick start guide’ to the Act.

The contents of this article are intended for general information purposes only and shall not be deemed to be, or constitute legal advice. We cannot accept responsibility for any loss as a result of acts or omissions taken in respect of this article.

Latest News

In a recent case, Plymouth Hospital NHS Trust was ordered to pay compensat...
With only a couple of months to go before the London 2012 Olympic Games co...
When a developer sought to make use of a 37-year-old planning permission b...
The European Commission has published its framework for modernising data p...
A compromise agreement is a legally binding agreement by which an employee...
A worker who developed asbestosis after being exposed to high levels of as...
In general, rents on property are exempt supplies for VAT purposes. Howeve...
When the owner of a property failed to register a right of access, trouble...
The aggregates, cement and ready-mixed concrete industries are the latest ...
In Bivonas LLP and others v Bennett , the Employment Appeal Tribunal (E...
Computer programs have been at the centre of many legal disputes. Although...
When a member of staff is on a temporary assignment, they are allowed to r...
Currently, any employee who has completed one year of continuous employmen...
Problems with doing ‘clean’ business in some jurisdictions are...
The Localism Act 2011 is expected to come fully into force in April 2012...
On 1 January 2012 a new Pre-Action Protocol came into force to deal with t...
For businesspeople from outside the EU who do not have a commercial sponso...
The laws relating to defamation apply equally to material posted on the In...
As of 1 April 2012, all VAT-registered businesses must file their VAT retu...
When the co-founder of two companies in the wind farm business was effecti...
A landlord who receives a deposit from a tenant in respect of an assured s...
A Trafford firm has been fined £145,000 after an employee fell throu...
If your business infringes the Intellectual Property (IP) rights of others...
The Chancellor’s Budget this year was set in the context of mixed ec...
The Government has accepted the recommendations of the Low Pay Commission ...
When a financial services company went into administration and came under ...
The Government is carrying out a review of the current dismissal process a...
VEER DHARA RESTAURANT AND COCKTAIL BAR Get 10% off your total f...
In Zulhayir v JJ Food Service Ltd. , the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EA...
The banks are set to face claims for compensation running to many billions...
Owners of furnished holiday letting (FHL) properties are reminded that new...
Pharmacist removed from Register for theft from Pharmacy A pharmacist w...
The GPhC has launched a formal consultation on their vision for a safe sys...
When the construction of a village hall did not proceed as planned, the co...
31 March is a common year-end for companies and, with that in mind, compan...
The Government has confirmed that the qualification period for the right t...
A French firm that manufactures cosmetics and requires them to be sold onl...
The wisdom of making sure that agreements are finalised in good time and n...
When a company engages in below-cost pricing or other ‘predatory&rsq...
Each year, around 11 million employees take sickness leave. Of these, 300,...
HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) have recently set up a taskforce to investig...
When an adjudicator in a construction dispute gives a ruling, the decision...
The Government has announced its proposals for reform of the employment la...
Design rights are not the same as copyright, but are valuable intellectual...
When a dispute arises concerning the meaning of a contract term that is ca...
A recent case ( Whitham v Club 24 Ltd. t/a Ventura ) sheds further light o...
A consultation on ways of making it easier for social housing providers t...
HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) will be targeting 6,000 Swiss bank accounts ...
There has recently been a further case on long-term sickness and a worker&...
Creating a commercial database and keeping it up to date is an expensive b...
When a supplier to a marquee company was not paid for goods it had supplie...