Direct Marketing Via E-mail - Regulations

UK law relating to the sending of unsolicited direct marketing material by electronic means are based on the EC Directive on Privacy and Electronic Communications.

A major aim of the Directive was to cut down on the amount of ‘spam’ that e-mail users receive from companies with whom they have never had dealings. The Department of Trade and Industry defines spam as ‘unsolicited commercial bulk e-mail sent without the consent of the addressee and without any attempt at targeting recipients who are likely to be interested in its contents’.

Whilst the intention behind the law is clear, the regulations only apply to UK businesses and will do nothing to prevent spam originating in countries where the relevant laws are less strict or, indeed, non-existent. For genuine UK businesses seeking to increase sales of their products to a targeted market, the effect will be more red tape in order to ensure they do not fall foul of the regulations.

The regulations apply to unsolicited commercial e-mails and text messages (SMS) sent to individual subscribers, rather than to company addresses, so much business-to-business e-marketing is not affected. However, under the regulations the term ‘individual subscriber’ includes sole traders, non-limited liability partnerships and their employees.

All direct marketing e-mails, regardless of whom they are sent to, must include clear sender and contact details. In addition:

  • businesses must gain prior consent in that an individual must have actively opted in before they are sent unsolicited marketing e-mail;
  • if your website uses cookies, or other tracking devices, to recognise previous visitors or to capture information about a user’s preferences, you must tell them this and inform them as to how any collected information will be used. Consumers must be given the right to refuse cookies;
  • individuals are given greater rights to decide whether they wish to be listed in subscriber directories. Directory providers will have to give them full information and a reinforced chance to be ex-directory.

If the recipient of the e-mail was a customer prior to 11 December 2003, you may continue to market to them providing:

  • their e-mail or SMS details were obtained through the sale, or negotiations for the sale, of a product or service;
  • the product or service you are marketing is a similar one;
  • the individual had the opportunity to opt out of receiving direct marketing material at the time they gave their contact details and is given the chance to unsubscribe or opt out on each new message that is sent; and
  • the identity of the sender is not concealed.

However, where a customer has previously registered an interest in a company’s products or services, but has neither bought anything nor entered into negotiations to purchase which then fell through, then that individual’s consent must be sought before you can contact them again for direct marketing purposes.

The Office of the Information Commissioner is responsible for enforcing the regulations by issuing enforcement orders to those who do not comply. Breach of an enforcement order is a criminal offence liable to a fine of up to £5,000 in a Magistrate’s Court or an unlimited fine if the trial is before a jury. Any individual who has suffered damages as a result of a breach of the regulations has the right to sue the person responsible for compensation.

View regulations.

If you market in this way it is important that your marketing database is accurate. We advise you to maintain separate lists for personal and business e-mail addresses where appropriate. Individual recipients should be given the opportunity to be removed from your database each time you send them mail and opt in consent should be obtained for all new customers. Remember too that existing data protection laws already regulate the processing of an individual’s personal data. Contact us if you would like individual guidance on how to make sure your direct electronic marketing methods comply with all the relevant laws.
View my profile
Jonathan Foy
Partner and Notary Public
T: 01727 735630 (DDI)
E:  
The contents of this article are intended for general information purposes only and shall not be deemed to be, or constitute legal advice. We cannot accept responsibility for any loss as a result of acts or omissions taken in respect of this article.

Latest News

A recent case ( Whitham v Club 24 Ltd. t/a Ventura ) sheds further light o...
A consultation on ways of making it easier for social housing providers t...
HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) will be targeting 6,000 Swiss bank accounts ...
There has recently been a further case on long-term sickness and a worker&...
Creating a commercial database and keeping it up to date is an expensive b...
When a supplier to a marquee company was not paid for goods it had supplie...
The Supreme Court has denied HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) the right of ap...
Under the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 (now superseded by the Equ...
HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) have announced that the Mortgage Verificatio...
The Privacy and Electronic Communications (EC Directive) (Amendment) Regu...
The Bribery Act 2010 came into force on 1 July 2011. Under Section 2 of ...
In Williamson & Soden Solicitors v Briars , the Employment Appeal T...
HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) have announced that, from 1 January 2012, su...
The Forum of Private Business (FPB) has reported a noticeable increase in ...
It is common for service charges to be paid ‘on account’ of th...
There are generally strict time limits that apply when presenting a claim ...
The penalties for engaging in anti-competitive behaviour are very substant...
The Government is proposing to integrate the operation of the Income Tax a...
When an elderly woman passed away, her daughter, who was her personal repr...
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has issued for consultation proposals for in...
In July, the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) announced that it...
When one business uses the trade marks of another, an action may be able t...
Company liquidations have edged up in the first quarter of 2011, with 4,12...
Every year the firm's Christmas party presents employees with the chance t...
If you are used to taking part of your company income by way of dividends ...
The Health and Safety Executive (HSE) has published provisional fatal inj...
When does a commercial property become vacant under a lease agreement? Thi...
  Luke Tucker Harrison, Senior Associate Solicitor in Debenhams Otta...
An advertising and media company run by a Mr Casey sought to register the ...
A recent survey of businesses carried out by the Institute of Chartered Ac...
Following its Resolving Workplace Disputes consultation and the Red Tape C...
Operators of Amusement With Prizes (AWP) machines who receive VAT refunds ...
Under the Agency Workers Regulations 2010 (AWR), which came into force o...
MoneySavingExpert.com (MSE) founder Martin Lewis has won summary judgment...
A developer who completely demolished a property when he only had permissi...
Two companies have been fined a total of £450,000 and ordered to pay...
The law relating to the fiduciary duties of directors is stricter than man...
News that HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) are to create a dedicated team of ...
The Supreme Court has handed down its decision in a case concerning the em...
On 1 October 2011, changes to the Housing Grants, Construction and Regene...
Following Lord Justice Jackson’s report on his review of civil litig...
As reported previously, the Working Time Regulations 1998 (WTR) as they ...
A covenant can either represent a commitment to do something or a commitme...
Readers are reminded that an application to reclaim VAT incurred in anothe...
Employers are reminded that new National Minimum Wage (NMW) rates came int...
When a licensing application cannot be heard because insufficient informat...
The Privacy and Electronic Communications (EC Directive) (Amendment) Regu...
Earlier this year, the Government published a consultation document entitl...
The Government is calling on businesses to have their say in the latest ...
An employee wishing to bring a claim of unfair dismissal must do so before...
HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) have won a major battle in the Supreme Court...