Equality Act 2010-Should Employers be Concerned?

There has been a considerable amount of media coverage on the impact of the Equality Act 2010 in recent weeks, but what are the implications for employers?

From 1st October the Equality Act 2010 came into force with the intention of pulling together all of the fragmented discrimination legislation which has been passed over the last 30 years. There are a number of important changes implemented by the Act which employers need to be aware of. We discuss below those of particular concern.

Widening Definitions

The definition of Direct Discrimination has been widened to apply where someone is treated less favourably “because of a protected characteristic”. The result is that Direct Discrimination will now extend to:
• Associative discrimination e.g. discriminating against someone because of their association with a member of a protected group such as caring for a disabled child.
• Perceptive Discrimination e.g. someone is treated less favourably as they are perceived to have a protected characteristic such as being homosexual regardless of whether that person actually has the protected characteristic.

The definition of harassment has also been widened. This will mean that employees will be able to complain about conduct they find offensive even if it is not directed at them e.g. the sexual harassment of a colleague. Employers may also be liable for harassment by third parties in the workplace such as customers or suppliers.

There have been changes in respect of protected groups. The most notable changes are that the definition of disability has been simplified so it is easier for an employee to show they are disabled. It is now also unlawful to treat a disabled person unfavourably because of something connected with their disability e.g. penalising an employee for disability related sick days.

Action Point- Employers should review and update policies concerning Equal Opportunities, Diversity and Bullying and Harassment to ensure they conform with the new Equality Act Definitions. All policies should cover the nine protected characteristics in the Equality Act 2010 which are age, disability, gender reassignment, marriage and civil partnership, pregnancy and maternity, race, religion or belief, sex and sexual orientation.

Employers should review sickness monitoring and absence procedures to ensure disability related absences are excluded.

Pre Employment health Checks

The Equality Act limits the circumstances in which employers can use pre-employment health questionnaires. Employers can only ask health related questions:
• To decide whether any reasonable adjustments are required for the interview process;
• To decide whether the applicant can carry out a function “intrinsic” to the role;
• To monitor diversity;
• To take positive action to assist disabled people get a job;
• To confirm an applicant has a disability where the job genuinely requires the individual to have that disability.

Once a formal offer of employment has been made, health related questions can be asked. However, if an employer were to withdraw an offer on health related grounds, they could be exposed to a disability discrimination claim.

Action Point- Employers should review all application forms used in the recruitment process and standard interview questions to ensure compliance. Offer letters and other standard paperwork should be reviewed to ensure that offers are not made subject to health related criteria.

Pay Secrecy

It is now unlawful to prevent or restrict employees from discussing their remuneration with fellow employees where the motive of the discussion is to identify unlawful discrimination. The result is that employees will find it easier to obtain information about differences in pay. It is unlawful to victimise an employee for making such disclosures.

Action Point- Employers may wish to review employee salaries to ensure any disparity in pay between similar level employees can be justified on non discriminatory grounds. The Equality Act will now make it even more difficult to police pay secrecy clauses so employers may consider they should be removed from their documentation.

Debenhams Ottaway can carry out Audits of all your Employment documentation and procedures to ensure compliance with current laws and best practice. We offer businesses a free review of contracts and policies as part of the Employer Support Service which fully protects your business against the financial exposure of an employment dispute for an agreed monthly fee. Click here for further details.

For further advice and information, please contact Louise Attrup on 01727 735 663 or via email on la@dolegal.co.uk

This newsletter has been published as general information on the interpretation and application of the law and in accordance with our website Terms and Conditions. It does not necessarily stand on its own and should not be relied upon as advice.

View my profile
Louise Attrup
Executive Partner
T: 01727 735663 (DDI)
E:  
The contents of this article are intended for general information purposes only and shall not be deemed to be, or constitute legal advice. We cannot accept responsibility for any loss as a result of acts or omissions taken in respect of this article.

Latest News

In a recent case, Plymouth Hospital NHS Trust was ordered to pay compensat...
With only a couple of months to go before the London 2012 Olympic Games co...
When a developer sought to make use of a 37-year-old planning permission b...
The European Commission has published its framework for modernising data p...
A compromise agreement is a legally binding agreement by which an employee...
A worker who developed asbestosis after being exposed to high levels of as...
In general, rents on property are exempt supplies for VAT purposes. Howeve...
When the owner of a property failed to register a right of access, trouble...
The aggregates, cement and ready-mixed concrete industries are the latest ...
In Bivonas LLP and others v Bennett , the Employment Appeal Tribunal (E...
Computer programs have been at the centre of many legal disputes. Although...
When a member of staff is on a temporary assignment, they are allowed to r...
Currently, any employee who has completed one year of continuous employmen...
Problems with doing ‘clean’ business in some jurisdictions are...
The Localism Act 2011 is expected to come fully into force in April 2012...
On 1 January 2012 a new Pre-Action Protocol came into force to deal with t...
For businesspeople from outside the EU who do not have a commercial sponso...
The laws relating to defamation apply equally to material posted on the In...
As of 1 April 2012, all VAT-registered businesses must file their VAT retu...
When the co-founder of two companies in the wind farm business was effecti...
A landlord who receives a deposit from a tenant in respect of an assured s...
A Trafford firm has been fined £145,000 after an employee fell throu...
If your business infringes the Intellectual Property (IP) rights of others...
The Chancellor’s Budget this year was set in the context of mixed ec...
The Government has accepted the recommendations of the Low Pay Commission ...
When a financial services company went into administration and came under ...
The Government is carrying out a review of the current dismissal process a...
VEER DHARA RESTAURANT AND COCKTAIL BAR Get 10% off your total f...
In Zulhayir v JJ Food Service Ltd. , the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EA...
The banks are set to face claims for compensation running to many billions...
Owners of furnished holiday letting (FHL) properties are reminded that new...
Pharmacist removed from Register for theft from Pharmacy A pharmacist w...
The GPhC has launched a formal consultation on their vision for a safe sys...
When the construction of a village hall did not proceed as planned, the co...
31 March is a common year-end for companies and, with that in mind, compan...
The Government has confirmed that the qualification period for the right t...
A French firm that manufactures cosmetics and requires them to be sold onl...
The wisdom of making sure that agreements are finalised in good time and n...
When a company engages in below-cost pricing or other ‘predatory&rsq...
Each year, around 11 million employees take sickness leave. Of these, 300,...
HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) have recently set up a taskforce to investig...
When an adjudicator in a construction dispute gives a ruling, the decision...
The Government has announced its proposals for reform of the employment la...
Design rights are not the same as copyright, but are valuable intellectual...
When a dispute arises concerning the meaning of a contract term that is ca...
A recent case ( Whitham v Club 24 Ltd. t/a Ventura ) sheds further light o...
A consultation on ways of making it easier for social housing providers t...
HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) will be targeting 6,000 Swiss bank accounts ...
There has recently been a further case on long-term sickness and a worker&...
Creating a commercial database and keeping it up to date is an expensive b...
When a supplier to a marquee company was not paid for goods it had supplie...