Checklist: Bribery Act 2010: what it means for your business

This checklist outlines the new offences introduced by the Bribery Act 2010 and the penalties for committing them. It also highlights practical steps that your business can take to help avoid breaching the legislation.

What is bribery?

Transparency International (a non-governmental anti-corruption organisation) defines bribery as “the offering, promising, giving, accepting or soliciting of an advantage as an inducement for an action which is illegal or a breach of trust.”

Why has the Bribery Act 2010 been introduced?

The Bribery Act 2010 was introduced to strengthen the existing bribery and corruption laws in the UK. The Organisation of Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) has repeatedly criticised the UK system for being weak and ineffective compared with the more robust regimes in other countries, such as the US Foreign and Corrupt Practices Act.

What are the new offences?

Bribing another person

  • A person will be guilty of this offence if they offer, promise or give a financial advantage or other advantage, to another person:
    • to bring about improper performance of a relevant function or an activity; or
       
    • to reward a person for the improper performance of a relevant function or an activity.
       
  • The types of function or activity that can be improperly performed include:
    • all functions of a public nature;
       
    • all activities connected with a business;
       
    • any activity performed in the course of a person’s employment; and
       
    • any activity performed by or on behalf of a body of persons.

This is where the person performing the function is expected to perform it in good faith or impartially or is in a position of trust by virtue of performing it. The function will be covered even if it has no connection with the UK or is performed outside the UK.

  • It may not matter whether the person offered the bribe is the same person that actually performs or performed the function or activity concerned.
     
  • The advantage can be offered, promised or given by the person themselves or by a third party.

Being bribed

  • The recipient or potential recipient of the bribe will be guilty of this offence if they request, agree to receive, or accept a financial or other advantage to perform a relevant function or activity improperly.
     
  • It does not matter whether it is the recipient, or someone else through whom the recipient acts, who requests, agrees to receive or accepts the advantage. In addition, the advantage can be for the benefit of the recipient or another person.

Bribing a foreign public official

  • A person will be guilty of this offence if they intend to influence an official in their capacity as a foreign public official. The offence does not cover accepting bribes, only offering, promising or giving bribes. It does not matter whether the offer, promise or gift is made directly to the official or by a third party.

Failing to prevent bribery

  • A commercial organisation will be guilty of this offence if a person associated with it bribes another person, with the intention of obtaining or retaining business or a business advantage for the commercial organisation. The offence can be committed in the UK or overseas.
     
  • A business will be able to avoid conviction if it can demonstrate that it had adequate procedures in place designed to prevent bribery.

What are the penalties for committing an offence?

  • The offences of bribing another person, being bribed and bribing a foreign public official are punishable on indictment either by an unlimited fine, imprisonment of up to ten years or both. Both a company and its directors could be subject to criminal penalties.
     
  • The new offence of failure to prevent bribery is punishable on indictment by an unlimited fine.
     
  • Businesses convicted of corruption could find themselves permanently debarred from tendering for public sector contracts.
     
  • Your business may also be damaged by adverse publicity if it is prosecuted for an offence.

Practical steps to help prevent your business breaching the Bribery Act 2010

Small and medium-sized enterprises will inevitably have fewer resources to counter bribery than larger companies. However, you can take some straight-forward measures to help prevent your business breaching the legislation.

Top level commitment

Make sure all senior managers and directors understand they could be personally liable under the Bribery Act 2010 for offences committed by the business. It is important that senior management lead the anti-bribery culture of your business, especially if it wants to take advantage of the “adequate procedures” defence to the offence of failing to prevent bribery.

Risk assessment

  • Make sure you understand the risks your business may be exposed to. For example, certain industry sectors (such as construction, energy, oil and gas, defence and aerospace, mining and financial services) and countries present a greater risk, as employees are more likely to engage in bribery in these areas. 
     
  • Think about the types of transactions your business engages in, who the transactions are with and how you undertake the transaction. High-risk transactions include:
    • procurement and supply chain management;
       
    • involvement with regulatory relationships (for example, licences or permits); and
       
    • charitable and political contributions.
       
  • Review how your business entertains potential customers, especially those from government agencies, state-owned enterprises or charitable organisations. Routine or inexpensive corporate hospitality is unlikely to be a problem, but you should put clear guidelines in place.
     
  • If your business operates in foreign jurisdictions, always check local laws.

Implementing and communicating an anti-corruption code of conduct

You should implement a code of conduct setting out clear, practical and accessible policies and procedures that apply to your entire business. This should be effectively communicated to all relevant persons.

Due diligence when dealing with third parties

Your business will be liable if a person associated with it commits an offence on your behalf. You should review all your relationships with any partners, suppliers and customers. For example, if an agent or distributor uses a bribe to win a contract for your business, you could be liable. You must ensure that background checks are carried out on any agents or distributors before you engage them.

Proportionate policies and procedures

Review any existing policies and procedures your business has on preventing bribery and corruption and decide whether they need to be updated. If you do not have any policies or procedures in place, you should consider preparing them as a matter of urgency. Transparency International has written a guide aimed at small businesses for countering bribery, which includes model corporate anti-bribery policies and programmes (see Transparency international: Business Principles for Countering Bribery). The Ministry of Justice has also published a Quick start guide.

Effective implementation and monitoring

  • You should consider introducing a compulsory training programme for all staff. If only a few of your employees operate in a high-risk area, make sure the training is targeted at them.
     
  • Ensure anti-corruption policies and procedures are continually monitored for compliance and effectiveness, both internally and externally.

More information

If you have any questions about the content of this checklist, please contact Michael Kerrigan on 01727 735674 or e-mail mk@dolegal.co.uk

The contents of this article are intended for general information purposes only and shall not be deemed to be, or constitute legal advice. We cannot accept responsibility for any loss as a result of acts or omissions taken in respect of this article.

Latest News

A recent case ( Whitham v Club 24 Ltd. t/a Ventura ) sheds further light o...
A consultation on ways of making it easier for social housing providers t...
HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) will be targeting 6,000 Swiss bank accounts ...
There has recently been a further case on long-term sickness and a worker&...
Creating a commercial database and keeping it up to date is an expensive b...
When a supplier to a marquee company was not paid for goods it had supplie...
The Supreme Court has denied HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) the right of ap...
Under the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 (now superseded by the Equ...
HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) have announced that the Mortgage Verificatio...
The Privacy and Electronic Communications (EC Directive) (Amendment) Regu...
The Bribery Act 2010 came into force on 1 July 2011. Under Section 2 of ...
In Williamson & Soden Solicitors v Briars , the Employment Appeal T...
HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) have announced that, from 1 January 2012, su...
The Forum of Private Business (FPB) has reported a noticeable increase in ...
It is common for service charges to be paid ‘on account’ of th...
There are generally strict time limits that apply when presenting a claim ...
The penalties for engaging in anti-competitive behaviour are very substant...
The Government is proposing to integrate the operation of the Income Tax a...
When an elderly woman passed away, her daughter, who was her personal repr...
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has issued for consultation proposals for in...
In July, the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) announced that it...
When one business uses the trade marks of another, an action may be able t...
Company liquidations have edged up in the first quarter of 2011, with 4,12...
Every year the firm's Christmas party presents employees with the chance t...
If you are used to taking part of your company income by way of dividends ...
The Health and Safety Executive (HSE) has published provisional fatal inj...
When does a commercial property become vacant under a lease agreement? Thi...
  Luke Tucker Harrison, Senior Associate Solicitor in Debenhams Otta...
An advertising and media company run by a Mr Casey sought to register the ...
A recent survey of businesses carried out by the Institute of Chartered Ac...
Following its Resolving Workplace Disputes consultation and the Red Tape C...
Operators of Amusement With Prizes (AWP) machines who receive VAT refunds ...
Under the Agency Workers Regulations 2010 (AWR), which came into force o...
MoneySavingExpert.com (MSE) founder Martin Lewis has won summary judgment...
A developer who completely demolished a property when he only had permissi...
Two companies have been fined a total of £450,000 and ordered to pay...
The law relating to the fiduciary duties of directors is stricter than man...
News that HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) are to create a dedicated team of ...
The Supreme Court has handed down its decision in a case concerning the em...
On 1 October 2011, changes to the Housing Grants, Construction and Regene...
Following Lord Justice Jackson’s report on his review of civil litig...
As reported previously, the Working Time Regulations 1998 (WTR) as they ...
A covenant can either represent a commitment to do something or a commitme...
Readers are reminded that an application to reclaim VAT incurred in anothe...
Employers are reminded that new National Minimum Wage (NMW) rates came int...
When a licensing application cannot be heard because insufficient informat...
The Privacy and Electronic Communications (EC Directive) (Amendment) Regu...
Earlier this year, the Government published a consultation document entitl...
The Government is calling on businesses to have their say in the latest ...
An employee wishing to bring a claim of unfair dismissal must do so before...
HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) have won a major battle in the Supreme Court...