IHT and Small Business

Inheritance Tax (IHT) is payable on a deceased person’s estate at 40 per cent above £325,000 (2012/13) – the current nil rate band. However, business property is treated differently from personal property and may qualify for  Business Relief, formerly called, and generally known as Business Property Relief (BPR). Businesses benefit from a more generous taxation system because of their role in providing economic growth.

BPR can provide 100 per cent relief from IHT on a sole trader’s business or partnership interests and can apply to shares in trading companies that are not quoted on a recognised stock exchange. Shares quoted on the Alternative Investment Market can also be eligible for 100 per cent BPR. There is no limit to the value of BPR which can be claimed. Business assets must have been owned by the donor for two years to qualify for BPR and the business in respect of which a claim is made must also be wholly or mainly a trading company. Investment companies and businesses dealing in shares, stocks, securities, lands or buildings do not qualify for BPR.

BPR at 50 per cent is available on land, machinery, plant and buildings used for business purposes, although they will need to have been owned and used mainly for business purposes within the past two years. It is also available for shares in quoted companies where the shareholder has a controlling interest of more than 50 per cent, although this is rare.

In the context of a family business, it may be preferable for a donor to leave IHT-exempt assets to a beneficiary other than their spouse or civil partner. There is no saving if business assets are passed to a beneficiary who would not be liable for IHT anyway. For example, a transfer of business assets qualifying for BPR to a spouse would achieve no IHT saving on that transfer, because transfers between spouses are normally exempt from IHT in any event. There are several issues to consider and expert advice is essential when undertaking IHT planning with regard to business assets.

No BPR is available where there is a binding contract for the sale of a business. This might occur where there are a small number of shareholders who have a shareholders’ agreement which requires that should one of them die, their executors will sell his or her holding to the remaining shareholders, who are required to buy it.

Even where shares would not qualify for BPR, the £3,000 annual tax-free allowance for IHT is available. A shareholder can use this to pass shares to anyone of their choosing. This can be used to give the beneficiary a gradually increasing interest in the company, reducing the IHT payable on the donor’s death. However, care should be taken because the values of ‘slices’ of the shareholdings can vary massively depending on what the voting rights involved are: never transfer shares without taking professional advice on the likely tax implications.

As an alternative approach, a person may choose to sell or wind up their business rather than leave it to beneficiaries in their will. They would then be able to leave liquid capital to their beneficiaries instead. This has the advantage that the value of the business would be precisely fixed and available in cash. However, cash does not qualify for BPR, so this approach has significant drawbacks.

The current law particularly benefits small businesses that are family owned trading companies. They will be likely to qualify for BPR and make the most of the possible IHT saving.

Sensible family wealth-protection planning takes account of family considerations as well as just tax law and should be part of a comprehensive plan which includes making sure your will is up to date and reflects your wishes. Contact us for advice on will planning and wealth protection issues. We can help you take tax-efficient and practical steps to ensure your family business is protected from the ravages of avoidable IHT and other taxes.

View my profile
Jonathan Foy
Partner and Notary Public
T: 01727 735630 (DDI)
E:  
The contents of this article are intended for general information purposes only and shall not be deemed to be, or constitute legal advice. We cannot accept responsibility for any loss as a result of acts or omissions taken in respect of this article.

Latest News

In a recent case, Plymouth Hospital NHS Trust was ordered to pay compensat...
With only a couple of months to go before the London 2012 Olympic Games co...
When a developer sought to make use of a 37-year-old planning permission b...
The European Commission has published its framework for modernising data p...
A compromise agreement is a legally binding agreement by which an employee...
A worker who developed asbestosis after being exposed to high levels of as...
In general, rents on property are exempt supplies for VAT purposes. Howeve...
When the owner of a property failed to register a right of access, trouble...
The aggregates, cement and ready-mixed concrete industries are the latest ...
In Bivonas LLP and others v Bennett , the Employment Appeal Tribunal (E...
Computer programs have been at the centre of many legal disputes. Although...
When a member of staff is on a temporary assignment, they are allowed to r...
Currently, any employee who has completed one year of continuous employmen...
Problems with doing ‘clean’ business in some jurisdictions are...
The Localism Act 2011 is expected to come fully into force in April 2012...
On 1 January 2012 a new Pre-Action Protocol came into force to deal with t...
For businesspeople from outside the EU who do not have a commercial sponso...
The laws relating to defamation apply equally to material posted on the In...
As of 1 April 2012, all VAT-registered businesses must file their VAT retu...
When the co-founder of two companies in the wind farm business was effecti...
A landlord who receives a deposit from a tenant in respect of an assured s...
A Trafford firm has been fined £145,000 after an employee fell throu...
If your business infringes the Intellectual Property (IP) rights of others...
The Chancellor’s Budget this year was set in the context of mixed ec...
The Government has accepted the recommendations of the Low Pay Commission ...
When a financial services company went into administration and came under ...
The Government is carrying out a review of the current dismissal process a...
VEER DHARA RESTAURANT AND COCKTAIL BAR Get 10% off your total f...
In Zulhayir v JJ Food Service Ltd. , the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EA...
The banks are set to face claims for compensation running to many billions...
Owners of furnished holiday letting (FHL) properties are reminded that new...
Pharmacist removed from Register for theft from Pharmacy A pharmacist w...
The GPhC has launched a formal consultation on their vision for a safe sys...
When the construction of a village hall did not proceed as planned, the co...
31 March is a common year-end for companies and, with that in mind, compan...
The Government has confirmed that the qualification period for the right t...
A French firm that manufactures cosmetics and requires them to be sold onl...
The wisdom of making sure that agreements are finalised in good time and n...
When a company engages in below-cost pricing or other ‘predatory&rsq...
Each year, around 11 million employees take sickness leave. Of these, 300,...
HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) have recently set up a taskforce to investig...
When an adjudicator in a construction dispute gives a ruling, the decision...
The Government has announced its proposals for reform of the employment la...
Design rights are not the same as copyright, but are valuable intellectual...
When a dispute arises concerning the meaning of a contract term that is ca...
A recent case ( Whitham v Club 24 Ltd. t/a Ventura ) sheds further light o...
A consultation on ways of making it easier for social housing providers t...
HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) will be targeting 6,000 Swiss bank accounts ...
There has recently been a further case on long-term sickness and a worker&...
Creating a commercial database and keeping it up to date is an expensive b...
When a supplier to a marquee company was not paid for goods it had supplie...