'Naming and Shaming' Employers Who Flout NMW Law

The scheme whereby the names of employers who breach National Minimum Wage (NMW) legislation are published by the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS) came into effect on 1 January 2011. The aims of the scheme are to deter employers who would otherwise be tempted to flout the law and to raise awareness of NMW enforcement in order to encourage more workers who are being paid less than the NMW to come forward.

The criteria for naming are not the same as those for prosecution. An employer will not be named under the scheme whilst prosecution proceedings are ongoing or are being considered. Where the Crown Prosecution Service rejects a potential case, the employer may still be named where the criteria for so doing are met. Employers that are successfully prosecuted will be named immediately.

HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) will refer cases to BIS where a Notice of Underpayment has been issued to the employer and there is evidence that one or more of the following criteria are met:

  • the employer knowingly or deliberately failed to comply with their NMW obligations;
  • the employer has previously received advice from HMRC about the steps they need to take to ensure future compliance with NMW legislation and has not taken those steps;
  • the employer has failed to take adequate steps to keep or preserve NMW records;
  • the employer has delayed or obstructed a NMW compliance officer in the performance of their duties;
  • the employer has refused or neglected to answer questions put to them by a NMW compliance officer;
  • the employer has refused or neglected to provide information or produce documents to a NMW compliance officer; or
  • the employer refused or neglected to pay arrears of the NMW to workers, following HMRC intervention, which has resulted in HMRC taking action against the employer to ensure payment of arrears to workers.

HMRC will only refer cases to BIS where the total amount of NMW arrears owed to workers is at least £2,000 and the average arrears per worker are at least £500. Employers will not be named where an appeal against the Notice of Underpayment is ongoing. Where an employer’s appeal is partially accepted but the criteria are still met, however, the employer may be named.

Employers will be given the opportunity to make representations against being named under the scheme and BIS will take these and public interest considerations into account when deciding whether or not to name an employer.

Aside from prosecution in cases where there is a serious breach of NMW law, a minimum penalty of £100 and a maximum penalty of £5,000 will be applied.

The full policy document on HMRC Enforcement, Prosecutions and Naming Employers Who Flout NMW Law can be found on the BIS website.

For advice on your obligations under NMW legislation, contact us.
View my profile
Louise Attrup
Executive Partner
T: 01727 735663 (DDI)
E:  
The contents of this article are intended for general information purposes only and shall not be deemed to be, or constitute legal advice. We cannot accept responsibility for any loss as a result of acts or omissions taken in respect of this article.

Latest News

With only a couple of months to go before the London 2012 Olympic Games co...
A compromise agreement is a legally binding agreement by which an employee...
In Bivonas LLP and others v Bennett , the Employment Appeal Tribunal (E...
Currently, any employee who has completed one year of continuous employmen...
For businesspeople from outside the EU who do not have a commercial sponso...
A Trafford firm has been fined £145,000 after an employee fell throu...
The Government has accepted the recommendations of the Low Pay Commission ...
The Government is carrying out a review of the current dismissal process a...
VEER DHARA RESTAURANT AND COCKTAIL BAR Get 10% off your total f...
In Zulhayir v JJ Food Service Ltd. , the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EA...
The Government has confirmed that the qualification period for the right t...
Each year, around 11 million employees take sickness leave. Of these, 300,...
The Government has announced its proposals for reform of the employment la...
A recent case ( Whitham v Club 24 Ltd. t/a Ventura ) sheds further light o...
There has recently been a further case on long-term sickness and a worker&...
Under the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 (now superseded by the Equ...
In Williamson & Soden Solicitors v Briars , the Employment Appeal T...
There are generally strict time limits that apply when presenting a claim ...
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has issued for consultation proposals for in...
In July, the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) announced that it...
Every year the firm's Christmas party presents employees with the chance t...
The Health and Safety Executive (HSE) has published provisional fatal inj...
Following its Resolving Workplace Disputes consultation and the Red Tape C...
Under the Agency Workers Regulations 2010 (AWR), which came into force o...
Two companies have been fined a total of £450,000 and ordered to pay...
The Supreme Court has handed down its decision in a case concerning the em...
As reported previously, the Working Time Regulations 1998 (WTR) as they ...
Employers are reminded that new National Minimum Wage (NMW) rates came int...
Earlier this year, the Government published a consultation document entitl...
The Government is calling on businesses to have their say in the latest ...
An employee wishing to bring a claim of unfair dismissal must do so before...
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are becoming increasingly common. Fo...
Following several suspicious deaths at Stepping Hill Hospital in Stockport...
Whilst the Internet, tweeting, blogging and the like have revolutionised t...
Businesses are reminded that new reporting arrangements for workplace heal...
A recent case ( Gosden v Lifeline Project Ltd. ) demonstrates that it is i...
The Government has accepted all the recommendations made in the recent rev...
The Advisory, Conciliation and Arbitration Service (ACAS) has issued guida...
The Government has announced that as part of its ongoing review of employm...
If an employee is dismissed following an unfair redundancy selection proce...
Whilst the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulation...
A recent case in the Court of Appeal ( Tilson v Alstom Transport ) dealt...
A manufacturing company based in Wigan has been fined £12,500 and or...
The Government’s review of the operation of health and safety legisl...
If you use Temporary Workers, you will need to prepare for the Agency Work...
The scheme whereby the names of employers who breach National Minimum Wage...
A committed Spiritualist has failed in his attempt to persuade the Employm...
As part of its comprehensive review of employment legislation, the Governm...
The Department for Business, Innovation and Skills has published guidance...
Employers are reminded that the Employment Equality (Repeal of Retirement...
The Health and Safety Executive (HSE) has published for consultation a pro...